The death of Left 4 Dead is paranoia or a harsh future?

The news that the remaining three companies from the first left will undoubtedly delight all players in Left 4 Dead 2 … But terribly scared users of the first part. It all started before the second part, a week after the announcement of LEFT 4 DeAD 2 on E3 2009, several LEFT 4 DeAD players called for a boycott of the second part of the game and created a group in Steam “L4D2 Boycott (No-L4D2)”, which very quickly entered more than 10,000 participants in one week, and more than 37,000 per month in a month. They were afraid that Valve would no longer support the first part of the game. The group leaders accepted the invitation to the L4D 2 test and it made a good impression on them, they soon announced the closure of the Boycot group. Leaders were announced in bribery with valves, but the information surfaced that the group members pretend to be more actively than the rest of the users – so the boycott was stopped. The races very cunningly acted, deciding to transfer all the companies to the second part + all the heroes, at one of the forums I noticed this assumption: “”. Left 4 Dead will finally die if all companies and characters with the entire sound bank of the first game will be moved to Left 4 Dead 2, and the control shot will make a “classic mode” – where there will be old bosses, balance, weapons, etc.D. “. Yes, all this is alarming, but still (in my opinion) the first left in some things all the same surpasses the second part. Firstly: the characters-in the first part, the survivors were better, we all got used to them, they were unique and memorable, because Francis’s “special” life position and the incredible optimism of Luis (I’m silent about pills), they became the pioneers of the apocalypse on our monitors and therefore they are dear to us. And the characters of the second part look more incompetent against the background of the first quartet, maybe Nick and Ellis are a little twisting the situation … But, I think this is not enough, secondly, the first part was much darker, unlike the “cheerfulness” of the second. There is still an opinion that the first part was more hardcore.
In general, it all depends on the players themselves, but still … nevertheless, numerous “cookies” (mutations, DLC, again adaptation of companies from the first part) for Left 4 Dead 2 will lure the players, as they said in the review? Ah, yes! Valve raised the killer of their masterpiece and gradually fed him, making even more. And what will happen when it comes out (if it comes out at all) L4D 3? Will Left 4 Dead 2 really repeat the fate of the predecessor ..
Whatever you say, and Left 4 Dead has already managed to become a classic and you just won’t make it from the pedestal, take at least an example from CS 1.6.

The best comments

The atmosphere endured + new monsters smeared a little emotions from the game. In the first part, the appearance of each new “special” zombie was a whole event that caused a storm of emotions and mats in Voice Chat. The second part became some more pop-up chtoli, not those emotions. I don’t know how to explain, those who have both games can understand ..

Because it is necessary to develop what is already there: modes, cards, monsters, chips in mechanics. This from the point of view of the efficiency is much better, although not so profitable for Valve. It is better to involve new people into the existing game than every 2 years to stamp the new part with a minimum of differences for the same audience. As practice shows, they “rattles” on the Internet and grow fans of the games that have a long life cycle. Code with a marketing budget of hundreds of millions of dollars does not count

If anything, all campaigns from the first part appeared gododds.uk in the second, almost immediately after the release of a special editor, forces of fans. and the point of carrying No Mercy, and now I don’t see the rest at all. And where does lure? who should have been playing in the original campaigns for a long time in the second Left

Perhaps you are right. BUT! This is to brate with minuses only for Valv. And I think that there are not idiots sitting there, and they understand that the new left will not pay off if it is not new

You masturbate? Nifiga did not understand. Instead of two games there will be one. I understand that the second is transferred to the second, then the cards. It is convenient. Less space will be engaged in a hard drive, and in order to play in the first part, it will not be necessary to leave the second and run the first. Logical. And this will not kill the first part why she should kill her, explain to me?

not everyone likes the changes that the second part has undergone. The result is logical, Valve released too similar to the original sequel to support both games, but this is already nagging on the topic “Why finally the second part?”. The main thing is that there is no 3rd L4D

Well, if in the 2nd they moved and so everything from the first part, then this is whining. And yes, there is something significant has changed? Well, besides the fact that the legs are not visible =/

I played both. No, I don’t understand.
A smarter storm, new mutants, daytime locations (finally! It was lifted in the darkness), the character of the characters is better visible … well, and t \ d

In general, stupidity in the post is written. And those who spent money on the first are complaining and do not want to buy 2nd> _>

death-left-4-dead-paranoia-ly-surovo-was-1

The death of Left 4 Dead is paranoia or a harsh future?

The best comments

发表评论取消回复

The death of Left 4 Dead is paranoia or a harsh future?

The best comments

发表评论 取消回复

发表评论取消回复